A study of pictures of Earth by night has revealed that artificial light is growing brighter and more extensive every year. Between 2012 and 2016, the planet’s artificially lit outdoor area grew by more than 2% per year. Scientists say a “loss of night” in many countries is having negative consequences for “flora, fauna, and human well-being”. A team published the findings in the journal Science Advances. Their study used data from a Nasa satellite radiometer – a device designed specifically to measure the brightness of night-time light. It showed that changes in brightness over time varied greatly by country. Some of the world’s “brightest nations”, such as the US and Spain, remained the same. Most nations in South America, Africa and Asia grew brighter. Only a few countries showed a decrease in brightness, such as Yemen and Syria – both experiencing warfare. The nocturnal satellite images – of glowing coastlines and spider-like city networks – look quite beautiful but artificial lighting has unintended consequences for human health and the environment.
Let the Sun go down
In 2016, the American Medical Association officially recognised the “detrimental effects of poorly designed, high-intensity LED lighting”, saying it encouraged communities to “minimise and control blue-rich environmental lighting by using the lowest emission of blue light possible to reduce glare. The sleep-inducing hormone melatonin is particularly sensitive to blue light. A recent study published in the journal Nature revealed that artificial light was a threat to crop pollination – reducing the pollinating activity of nocturnal insects. Research in the UK revealed that trees in more brightly lit areas burst their buds up to a week earlier than those in areas without artificial lighting. A study published earlier this year found that urban light installations “dramatically altered” the behaviour of nocturnally migrating birds.
‘Less light, better vision’
“You now struggle to find anywhere in Europe with a natural night sky – without that skyglow we’re all familiar with.”
Prof Gaston added that he found the continuing increase in light pollution curious. “Usually,” he explained, “when we think of how humanity messes with environment, it’s a costly thing to fix or reverse.
“For light, it’s just a case of directing it where we need it and not wasting it where we don’t.”
Dr Kyba said that we could make our urban areas much dimmer and not actually cause any problems for visibility.
“Human vision relies on contrast, not the amount of light,” he explained.
“So by reducing contrast outdoors – avoiding glaring lamps – it is actually possible to have improved vision with less light.
“That could mean big energy savings – but our data show that on a national and global scale, this is not the direction we are heading.”